Design prototype · synthetic data
This is a synthetic editorial sample. The filer, security, dates and figures below are invented to demonstrate the publication substance standard. It is not a published finding, not a claim about any real person or company, and no part of it describes actual disclosure data.
Representative sample · public research / archive item
Reading disclosure lag: why the filing date is not the news date
TradingEdgeIQ editorial desk (sample) · published 2026-08-30 · revision 1 · no corrections recorded
Demonstrates: Methodology and caveat explanation
Both illustrative records below report a transaction date and a separate filing date. In the first, 56 days separate them; in the second, 14.
The Research Attention Score treats those two records differently on the timeliness component alone: the later filing scores higher for attention, because a longer gap means the market had more time to move before the information became public. Direction contributes no points to either.
The practical consequence is that a feed sorted by transaction date and a feed sorted by public-availability date tell different stories about the same week. CTI sorts by public availability, and shows both dates on every record, because a reader who anchors on the transaction date will consistently misjudge what was knowable and when.
Statutory reporting windows for congressional transactions are set out in the STOCK Act; the filings themselves, not this publication, are the authoritative record of compliance with them.
Why it matters
Disclosure lag is the single most misread field in this dataset. It changes what a record can support as evidence, and it is the difference between describing a filing and implying foreknowledge.
Why it may not
Lag is a property of the filing process, not of the filer's intent. A long gap is consistent with an administrative delay, a late-arriving brokerage statement, or a reporting practice that has nothing to do with the transaction itself. Nothing here supports an inference about why a filing was late.
The illustrative records this note refers to
Design prototype · synthetic data
Rep. Avery Lindholm (illustrative)
Member of Congress · House · XX
- Asset as filed
- Zephyr Quantum Alloys (illustrative)
- Mapped security
- ZZQA
- Reported transaction
- Purchase
- Disclosed value range
- $15,001 – $50,000
- Transaction date
- 2026-05-04
- Filed / public date
- 2026-06-29
- Reported owner
- Owner category not published by the source
Reported 56 days after the transaction.
61Research attention score · cti-score-1.0.0-uncalibrated
Research attention score — not investment advice. Named score bands are off: the model is uncalibrated, so the number is shown without a label.
Medium confidence
Why this ranked
- Filed 56 days after the transaction, in the slowest reported band.
- Disclosed range sits in the mid magnitude band.
- First reported activity in this security by this filer in the reference window.
What could weaken this interpretation
The disclosed range spans more than three times its lower bound, so the size of the position is only loosely constrained.
Reported as an original filing.
Provider record available. This feed does not supply an official House or Senate document link; TradingEdgeIQ has not synthesized one.
Sen. Marisol Trewin (illustrative)
Member of Congress · Senate · XX
- Asset as filed
- Halcyon Vale Industries (illustrative)
- Mapped security
- ZZHV
- Reported transaction
- Sale (partial)
- Disclosed value range
- $50,001 – $100,000
- Transaction date
- 2026-05-19
- Filed / public date
- 2026-06-02
- Reported owner
- Owner category not published by the source
Reported 14 days after the transaction.
48Research attention score · cti-score-1.0.0-uncalibrated
Research attention score — not investment advice. Named score bands are off: the model is uncalibrated, so the number is shown without a label.
Medium confidence
Why this ranked
- Filed 14 days after the transaction, inside the prompt band.
- Disclosed range sits in the upper-mid magnitude band.
What could weaken this interpretation
The source publishes no owner category, so this may be a spouse or dependent holding rather than the filer's own.
Reported as an original filing.
Provider record available. This feed does not supply an official House or Senate document link; TradingEdgeIQ has not synthesized one.
How each claim on this page is classified
- Filed fact
- Reported in a public financial-disclosure filing. The official filing is the authoritative source.
- Independently sourced context
- Background drawn from a source other than the disclosure filing, cited where it is used.
- Deterministic CTI analysis
- Computed by a versioned TradingEdgeIQ rule from the filed facts. Reproducible from the same inputs; not a statement by Congress.
- Editorial interpretation
- A judgement by the TradingEdgeIQ editorial desk. Identified as opinion, not as a reported or computed fact.